Printout from Pearl Cohen Zedek Latzer

David Loewenstein

David Loewenstein

Partner, New York

   Contact information

  • (646) 878-0806

Admitted

  • New York State Bar
  • U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
  • U.S. Patent & Trademark Office
  • U.S. District Court, SDNY
  • U.S. District Court, EDNY
  • U.S. Supreme Court
  • U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Education

Fordham Law School, J.D., 1987

Columbia University, M.S., 1984

Tufts University, B.S., 1981
 

About David Loewenstein

David is a Partner in the Patents, Litigation, Trademarks, Copyrights and Designs Groups in PCZL’s New York office.  He has over 20 years of patent litigation experience at all levels, from trial to appeal, and he has been involved in a wide array of technologies for numerous multinational companies, including:

Ford Motor Company (electronic engine controls)

Procter & Gamble (computer software)

Varian Associates (Fourier Transform NMR instruments)

Fujitsu (cell phone filters and other technology)

C.R. Bard (medical devices)

W.L. Gore (variety of Gore-Tex products)

Bombardier, Inc. (patent case concerning 33 patents related to personal watercraft)

Boehringer Ingelheim Corp. (Oxycontin litigation)

Coulter (monoclonal antibodies and flow cytometers)

Given Imaging (imaging capsules)

David has worked with both Xerox and British Telecom (VOIP) on various litigation and pre-litigation matters, and was also a member of the trial team in the historic Polaroid v. Kodak damages trial.  His reported cases include:

Agostini v. Felton, 521 U.S. 203 (1997);

Young v. Lumenis, Inc., 492 F.3d 1336 (Fed. Cir. 2007);

Horphag Research Ltd. v. Consac Industries, Inc., 1997 WESTLAW 196744, 42 U.S.P.Q.2d 1567 (Fed. Cir. 1997);

Gentex Corp. v. Donnelly Corp., 69 F.3d 527, 36 U.S.P.Q.2d 1667 (Fed. Cir. 1995);

WRE-Hol, LLC v. Pharos Sci. & Applications, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 82570 (W.D. Wash. July 23, 2010);

Immersion Med. Inc. v. Mentice AB, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 92034 (E.D. Tex. Sept, 29, 2009);

Landmark Graphics Corp. v. Seismic Micro Tech., Inc., 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6897 (S.D. Tex. Jan. 31, 2007);

Young v. Lumenis, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27792, (S.D. Ohio 2005);

Infineon Technologies AG, v. Green Power Technologies Ltd., 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11877 (D. DC. 2005);

Measurement Computing Corp. v. General Patent Corp. Int'l, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2082, (D. Mass. February 10, 2004);

Brown v. 3M, 60 U.S.P.Q.2d 1298 (D. Ariz. 2000);

National Research Development Corp. v. Varian Associates, Inc., 822 F. Supp. 1121 (D. N.J. 1993)

Polaroid Corp. v. Eastman Kodak Co., 16 U.S.P.Q.2d 1481 (D. Mass. 1990); and

Gardner v. Ford Motor Co., 17 U.S.P.Q.2d 1177 (W.D. Wash. 1990).

David's recent representative matters include:

Smarter Agent v. Mobile Card Cast, Goomzee, StreetEasy, Terrostar (mobile real estate applications)

M2M v. Telit et al. (M2M communications)

Mobileye v. iOnRoad (computer vision)

Remote Light v. Galikers and United Dairy (UV water disinfectant)

Like.com v. Superfish (imaging software)

WRE v. Telmap (GPS software)

CCP Systems AG v. Samsung and IBM (printer software)

Nautilus Neurosciences v. Edict Pharmaceuticals (ANDA litigation)

CardioFocus v. New Star, Trimedyne, Convergent (medical lasers)

Berger v. New York International Enterprises (trademark)

PSB Investissement v. O2 (trademark infringement)

Memory Control Enterprises v. OfficeMax (e-commerce software)

Cutex v. Laboratories Delon (trademark infringement)

Smarttrac v. OTI (RFID cards)

Landmark/Halliburton v. Paradigm (oil exploration software)

Languages

English, Spanish & German

Publications

Patent Litigation in the Eastern District of Texas: Is the Party Over? David Loewenstein and Douglas Gilbert IP Law 360, January 13, 2009

“Pitfalls In Indemnification Provisions In Intellectual Property Agreements,” les Nouvelles, Journal Of The Licensing Executives Society, September 2002.

Authored a chapter entitled “Patent Opinions” in Intellectual Property Assets in Mergers and Acquisitions (2002).

The Federal Circuit’s En Banc Decision in Johnson & Johnston, Inc. v. R.E. Services, Inc., The New York Law Journal, June 4, 2002.

Recent Federal Circuit Decisions Focus On Defenses, The National Law Journal, April 15, 2002.

A Critical Analysis of the Bard v. M3 Systems Decision, International Legal Strategy (May 2002).

“Dangers in Joint Patent Ownership”, les Nouvelles Journal Of The Licensing Executives Society, vol. XXXII No. 1 (March 1998).

Co-author with Christopher E. Chalsen “Venue Selection For Patent Infringement Actions In The United States,” International Legal Strategies, vol. VI-12 (1997).

Prepared a paper for Herbert F. Schwartz, Esq. entitled "Patent Damages" given at the August 1993 ABA Intellectual Property Law Section Meeting.

"A Ping Pong Playing Robot," Robotics Age, 1983.

Practice areas

Industries

Find professionals by